Posts Tagged ‘photography’
With a headline like that on ABC.com coupled with a photo album of “Racy Advertisements” you’d expect her to be showing a nipple or an ass cheek. If this is considered “racy” then you may as well list every fashion ad in existence.
Filed under: Eh. | 2 Comments
Tags: advertising, photography, print, ridiculous
Hands down, this wins the creepiest Friday FAIL I’ve ever posted. Via.
Filed under: Are you kidding me? | Closed
Tags: fail, photography, stock, weird
Britney Spears is retouched!
Oh my God! Everyone get ready to freak out! Britney Spears was retouched in a new ad for Candies! Wait… You’re not pissed? Doesn’t everyone freak out any time they find out a model was digitally enhanced in an ad? And it was Britney who personally released the unretouched photos? What the Hell is this […]
Filed under: Eh. | Closed
Tags: photography, retouching
The dangers of stock.
Unfortunately, these days cheap stock photography is more the rule than the exception for cheap clients and bad design. It can also be a godsend for clients who simply don’t have the budget for full-on photo shoots. But regardless of the reasons for using stock, it’s too bad that most clients and agencies don’t really […]
Filed under: Are you kidding me? | Closed
Tags: photography, ridiculous, stock
No copywriter necessary.
Megan Fox for the Emporio Armani’s Spring/Summer 2010 collection. That is all. The rest, here. You’re welcome.
Filed under: Good Stuff | 1 Comment
Tags: good, photography, print
Photoshop in the wrong hands.
There are numerous sites devoted to terrible, terrible Photoshop work – because there’s an endless supply of material. The Web Urbanist has a great round-up of some of the worst examples. How these visuals make it by anyone, I’ll never know. Doesn’t everyone by now realize that people notice this stuff? You can’t incorrectly fake […]
Filed under: Are you kidding me? | 2 Comments
Tags: photography, ridiculous, screw-up
And you thought the Ralph Lauren retouching was bad… There’s lots more here of actual child photos retouched into alien life forms. Via.
Filed under: Are you kidding me? | 1 Comment
Tags: photography, retouching, ridiculous
Dear Ralph,
Dear Ralph Lauren, Not that we believed you in the first place, but when we keep seeing pictures like this, it’s getting harder to believe your other Photoshop-emaciated models were an accident. Let’s stop playing this little game, shall we? Thanks. Sincerely, People whose pelvises are wider than our heads. Via.
Filed under: Are you kidding me? | 1 Comment
Tags: advertising, photography, retouching, ridiculous
You think she’s retouched?
I have no idea why the U.K. and France are considering requiring disclaimers on all retouched photos in advertising. I mean don’t all women have thighs as big around as their biceps and heads that are wider than the rest of their bodies? Via.
Filed under: Are you kidding me? | 1 Comment
Tags: advertising, photography, retouching, ridiculous
